Readings and online activities done by each student individually.
This case was loosely based on an incident in the Rockies in February several years ago (exact date and location are withheld out of courtesy to the victim/family). It was near midday on a warm, sunny afternoon, similar to the conditions you would've experienced in the latter part of the week. No large avalanches had been observed in the past week. The avalanche forecast warned of persistent weak layer buried deep in the snowpack. The danger was rated moderate. It also mentioned that southerly-facing slopes under the warm afternoon sun would be the most suspect, especially in thinner snowpack areas. The ski party was on a 35° steep slope, similar to the slopes your group was planning to make side trips onto. Two skiers started down the slope when they triggered a large avalanche from a small area of thin snowpack where the slope angle was locally steeper. The slide was 400-m wide, 1000-m long, and 40- to 200-cm deep. One skier was able to escape, skiing off to the side. The other skier was caught and only partially buried. Unfortunately he was killed by trauma during the course of the avalanche. The initial NWP weather forecast that was available to you was accurate for most of the week. However, a storm did move in on Friday night, continuing into the day Saturday. This wouldn't be an issue had you started on Monday (finishing Friday). If you started a day later on Tuesday, luckily, your party would have already climbed over the Balfour High Col - the most weather-exposed part of the route on Friday. You would have been at the Duncan Hut Friday night, and had a short exit off the glacier on Saturday down below treeline where stormy conditions would be less of an issue. |
Related Stories and Links
|
|
If you could start over for this particular case study (knowing the actual outcome from Step 7), what would you do differently as a pilot? For example, would you make a different decision? Would you want more or different data to help you make your decision (if so, which data), etc. Enter your statements into the UBC Canvas system, for the module: Snow Sports s00 Step 10. These count towards your grade (for grade weights, see the Evaluation link from the course home page). The grade is based on the relevance of your statements for the scenario of this learning module, and on the indication that you learned from your mistakes (if any), not on the amount of statements you make. Please be brief/succinct. |
UBC ATSC 113 - Weather for Sailing, Flying & Snow Sports • Copyright © 2016 by Roland Stull • Last updated Oct 2016.