Reply to the Class et al. discussion of “Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Ridge”
Reply to the Class et al. discussion of “Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Ridge”
Title
Reply to the Class et al. discussion of “Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Ridge”