aglo

Exercises:  
c. Using 2D DC resistivity inversion


 

Page contents: | Introduction | Setup | Survey | Processing | First result | Second inversion | Tighter misfit | Synthesis |

Introduction

Objectives of this exercise are to practice using 2D DC resistivity data and inversion, with an emphasis on the importance of obtaining several equally valid models before finalizing interpretations. A separate page contains questions that you should be able to answer if you understand what is going on. If this exercise is an assignment for a course, your instructor may require answers to these questions for marking. The exercise should take students new to DC resistivity roughly 4hrs to complete.

As this is an applications problem we will follow the seven step framework for applying geophysics.

WARNING: please read all instructions carefully, and don't rush.

Setting up the codes:

For installation see Chapter 10, Section b.2, the DCIP2D QuickStart page. On that page, the test steps that follow installation instructions are recommended, but optional if you are going to complete the exercises below.


Sidebar1; notes about software (click to expand). Programs, file names, and directories (ie "folders").
  • All executable program files must be in the one subdirectory.
  • The forward modelling calculations are carried out by dcipf2d.exe BUT this code is run from within the user interface dcip2d-model-maker.exe.
  • The file containing calculated data will always be called "model.con". You must change this file name (in Window's explorer or equivalent) before running a new forward calculation otherwise the previous calculated data set will be lost.
  • Use links in Chapter 10, section b for full instructions on graphical interface programs and modelling/inversion codes.

Steps 1 and 2 - Setup and Physical Properties

First a little thought should be put into the context of the problem. The geotechnical task involves locating and characterizing the width, depth, and composition a shallow trench at the field site sketched in Figure 1. The trench was dug to contain utilities, but we are not interested in them; just the trench itself. The survey was performed along the line shown, and the target was expected to be somewhere under this line, lying roughly perpendular to the line.


Figure 1: field site sketch with survey line marked.

Before considering geophysical work, some expecations should be built up in your mind. Questions such as the following should be answered quickly and briefly, using common sense, professional intuition, and any knowledge you might have about the field site or other similar or nearby sites. The questions are listed on the separate questions page. Note that, even if you are not answering questions as part of a course assignment, questions like these should always be considered because applying geophysics can never be successful without some expectations about the context.



Figure 2: a generic dipole-dipole survey electrode arrangement.

Figure 3: Data recorded using n=1.

Figure 4: Data recorded using n=3.
SIDEBAR 2: Drag & drop for UBCGIF programs
Many of the dialogue boxes that ask for file names can be filled by dragging a file name from MS Explorer and dropping it into the box. Be careful to choose files from the correct folder because file names are not unique.
SIDEBAR 3: Data errors
Characterizing standard deviation of data is necessary. It is done using two parts. The first specifies uncertainty for every data point as a percentage of the value. The second part is a fixed small voltage which ensures that data values close to zero will not have a tiny standard deviation assigned.

How did we choose 10% and 0.01V minimum? this is a choice based on knowledge of the data set. Many data sets will be more accurate than that, but we have found this choice to work for now.
SIDEBAR 4: Saving images from programs
To save images of data or models you must click the “copy” button on the tool bar, then goto an open document (MS Word or WordPad) move the cursor to where you want the image to appear, the press CTRL-V to paste the image into the document. It is very important that images have captions outlining what they are.

Steps 3 and 4, surveys and data

The first thing done during this survey was to move a fixed dipole-dipole electrode array along the line using a fixed geometry of "a"=2 and "n"=1. Based upon the field site sketch above, the first measurement location had the current source's left electrode on line position -2 metres and the resulting apparent resistivity profile is shown on the graph shown Figure 3. The second thing done was to repeat the profile using n=3. Finally, a complete resistivity data set was gathered involving n=1, 2, 3, and 4.

This raw data set can be examined using the "dcip2d-data-viewer.exe" program. The data file itself can be seen here. Right click the link and save to a new working folder under the folder containing the modelling and inversion codes on your local computer. (NOTE: if you don't already have the inversion codes, see sidebar 1 above). View this data set by opening it within the program “dcip2d-data-viewer.exe”. The objective is to gain some feeling for what information the data might contain, and for data quality. Questions on the questions page provide guidance for how to make use of raw data images prior to processing and nterpretation.


Steps 5 and 6 : Processing (in this case, 2D inversion) and interpretation

Steps 5 and 6 often require some iteration because the amount of processing may be determined by interpretation that is carried out as results are produced.

After examining raw data, the next step is to invert the data. If you have difficulty using the programs be sure to ask the instructor for help. NOTE that for this lab it is especially important to keep work in the folders recommended in the instructions. Many files are produced by the inversion program and they have fixed, non-adjustable names. Your work must be managed using folders and subfolders instead of file names.

The following list of steps walks you through the process of running an initial inversion.

  • Start the inversion program "dcip2d-gui.exe" and select the data file "dc.dat" for the "DC observations file" (see Sidebar 2).
  • View this data set (click "View Data => Errors”). You have already examined this data set.
  • The first step is to assign a statistical reliability for the data by using the Edit => Assign standard deviation ... (do not use the "Add ..." option).
  • Enter 10 for percent and 0.01 (units are Volts) for the minimum. See Sidebar 3.
  • Save this file with its standard deviation assignments using the File menu, Save ... option.
  • Close the data viewing window and return to the inversion control window. For our first inversion we will let the program define defaults for nearly all the other parameters in the control window.
  • Make sure that Chifact = 1 is specified (top left of the control window).
  • Ensure all other parameters are set to “Default”.
  • Save this setup (using the toolbar save button, or File menu) to the same folder from which the data file was obtained.
  • Then click the Run button. This inversion should take around 10-20 iterations.

Assessing the first inversion result

Assessment of the inversion result requires inspection of three aspects - (1) a log file listing how the program performed, (2) the data predicted by the final model must be inspected to see if it looks like the measurements, (3) the final model itself must be evaluated. The following items provide guidance for for these three aspects:

  1. When the inversion is complete view the log file (click the toolbar button called “Log”) and go straight to the bottom of this text file. Question 15 is relevant at this point.
  2. The second assessment step is to compare data predicted by the program, with the actual measured data. Click the “Pre” button in the main DCIP interface. Question 16 is relevant here.
  3. Display the model recovered by inversion by clicking the model button on the toolbar.
    • Use the Options menu, Padding cells ... option to adjust the image so that 5 padding cells are removed from each side and the bottom of the model.
    • Display the convergence curves, then copy the complete image of model and convergence curves into your working (or answer) document.

Question 17 helps you consider the model itself, and question 18 helps you consider the convergence information.

No single inversion result should be used as the final model to be intereted. Since an infinite number of models are possible, several should be produced so that you can gain an understanding about which regions of the models are reliable, and which regions should be ignored.


Second inversion

Sidebar 5: For the first run, the program chose a reference resistivity equal to the average of all apparent resistivities. Then the inversion process tried to find a model that was as close as possible to a halfspace with this value yet was still able to reproduce the data.

Keep the inversion control window open but close all other windows. To make a new model we will ask the program to find a model that is as close as possible to a different reference model (see Sidebar 5 regarding reference models).

  • Take the smallest value of resistivity recovered in the first model and round it up to the nearest 10's.
  • Then, in the program's interface window, click the "Value" radio button in the "Reference model" area, and enter this value of resistivity to replace the value that is there.
  • Now you MUST save this new setup. Use the "save button", specify a new folder, then save the setup. If you do not specify a new folder, your previous inversion result will get overwritten.

Now run the inversion. When done, view the result. Change viewing parameters so they are the same as those of your first inversion. This includes padding, inclusion of convergence curves, and setting the colour scale to the same values as the first result. Questions in this section guide the way you should think about this result.


SIDEBAR 6: so-called "DOI" images
The DOI image is generated by comparing two inversion results. One of the two models is simply subtracted from the other. In areas where the result is close to zero the two models must be similar. In other areas the two models must be different.

It is sensible to believe portions that are similar regardless of how we, the user, specify what type of "optimal" model to choose. Those portions are similar because the measurements force the model to contain the structures that are visible.

Elsewhere, the result depended upon our choice of parameters, therefore it is not likly to reflect true geology.

Using two models

We will work with both results to build an improved image which characterizes which portions of the model are most reliable. Select Options => Depth of investigation. Specify the "second inversion model" by browsing to the folder where your first model result was saved, and choose the file called "dcinv2d.con". If you get a warning message saying "The two refrence models appear to be identical", you have not found the first result.

Leave the "cutoff" value at 0.3, and click "OK". The result should be a model shown with a portion displayed with hash-marks. Copy this image into your working document and add a caption.

Tightening misfit

Finally let us see if we can acquire an alternative model by asking the program to try and recreate the data more accurately. This is the same as saying we feel that the 10% error with 0.01V minimum were pessimistic and that we think data were more accurate than that.

  • Set up a new inversion using all the same parameters as last time, but change the value of Chifact to half it's most recent value.
  • Save to a new folder and run the inversion.

Adjust the model image so it has the same padding cells removed, the same min / max for the colour scale, and the same depth of investigation imaging (again using the original inversion). Copy this image into your working document and add a caption.

Step 7: Synthesis

The work is not done until results are considered carefully in context with all other knowledge about the job. The three images of your models must be assessed together, so they should be set up in your working document as specified above, with captions. Questions guide the thinking of this final step of the work.