Reply to the Class et al. discussion of" Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from asymptotically equal to 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Rige"
Reply to the Class et al. discussion of" Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from asymptotically equal to 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Rige"
Title
Reply to the Class et al. discussion of" Temporal evolution of the Kerguelen plume: geochemical evidence from asymptotically equal to 38 to 82 Ma lavas forming the Ninetyeast Rige"